The Joining Dots Blog

Studying what happens when people, information and technology collide.
Exploring the possibilities. This blog is for sharing news, links and observations.

09 February 2010

Online Web Event - Managing SharePoint 2007 Site Permissions

On February 8th, I delivered a free short online web cast based on my presentation 'Managing SharePoint 2007 Site Permissions'. Organised by Mark Miller at EndUserSharePoint.com, the event was recorded and is available for download.

To go into more detail about managing SharePoint site permissions and how to apply security in SharePoint, Mark has organised a follow-up 2 hour live web event. It is being held on 1st March at 13:00 EST (6pm GMT). I'll be presenting again but the plan is for this event to be as interactive and hands-on as possible. Each attendee will be given a SharePoint site to practice with. We'll be walking through how to apply permissions, best practices for deciding how to manage permissions and there will be plenty of time for questions about specific security scenarios and concerns. For this event there is a registration fee of $129 (approx £80) which includes access to a recording of the event on-demand for future reference.

References:

(Originally posted on www.sharepointsharon.com)

02 February 2010

US Olympic web site launched on SharePoint 2010 beta

The United States Olympic Committee have launched a new Press Portal ready for the Winter Olympics being held in Vancouver shortly. The portal is a public web site running on SharePoint Server 2010 Beta with Silverlight serving up embedded media:


I would criticise some elements of the user interface design. Embedding external links in the top navigation bar is not a great idea (first 5 links are for within the web site, from TEAMUSA.ORG onwards are links to external web sites - different font and background colour but not obvious). The Latest News would be easier on the eye to scan if there were a thumbnail for each (instead of author which is not necessary on the home page) and a bit more space between each news item. And there are three different search boxes on the page. Would be great to see an update post-Olympics to identify which one was used the most... But I'm being picky. It's a brave move to publish such a visible web site on beta software and the site demonstrates how much easier it is to make SharePoint 2010 not look like SharePoint. Congratulations to all involved.

For more information: Visit the USOC web site | Microsoft press release

01 February 2010

The clue is in the I of iPad

Image source: Ali Smiles on Flickr

...and it's I as in interaction, not information...

On January 27th, the rumour mill surrounding Apple’s tablet plans was finally put to rest with the announcement of the iPad. Whilst some have raved about Apple’s latest creation, others have been quick to voice their disappointment and reasons to not like it.

Why the marmite-like reaction – with some thinking the iPad looks great whilst so many of the normal Apple fan club disappointed? A few bloggers have already hit the nail on the head
“Most people who attended the iPad unveiling and are now writing about the iPad are misunderstanding its intended audience because they’re not in it”
                                                          – Mike Rundle ‘The iPad Is For Everyone But Us’
The iPad is the first PC-like device that puts technology and expertise in the background. It’s not about tinkering with the operating system or doing niche heavy duty graphics design work. It’s about quick and easy digital access to content, whether you’re reading, creating or sharing with others.

The mistake Microsoft made with its mobile phone software was making a mini version of Windows for mobile devices, assuming everyone would use a stylus to cope with the tiny weeny buttons for accessing apps.

Apple came along and treated mobile phone apps as different to the PC. Goodbye stylus.

The netbook market has been about a device that is an under-powered replica of a laptop, with all the same portable issues that laptops have. Using laptops whilst standing, walking or sitting anywhere without a flat table at a comfortable height to your body is difficult. Given you can get full powered laptops for the same size and battery life as a netbook, the only real advantage for the netbook in its current form is the price.

Apple has just come along and treated netbook apps as different to the PC. Goodbye physical keyboard.

I don't use an iPhone and am not a huge Apple fan, I use Apple products when they're the best fit for purpose which is why I have a 13" MacBook Pro. And it has one feature that makes me think the iPad will be a success. The touchpad on the MacBook Pro (MBP) has similar capabilities to the screen of an iPhone - you can swipe to scroll and pinch to zoom in and out. It seems such a little feature. Yet it is so comfortable, easy and quick to navigate content that I've started doing the same action on my other laptop and get frustrated when I realise it only works on the MBP. It's made me rethink the value of the touch interface for interacting with information.

From initial hands-on comments from others, the iPad isn't perfect but how bad are the flaws?
  • If it can’t do multi-tasking, that’s an issue if you can’t quickly switch between apps (the comments about speed suggest you can). I’d miss not having a small window of one type of app (chat, video) overlapping another app (note taking, reading docs) but how hard will it be to create apps that integrate multi-tasking a single view?
  • Lack of Flash support depends on what the future looks like without Flash...
  • Lack of ports for plugging in cameras or memory cards depends on if people continue to download pics and videos to their computer first instead of uploading straight to YouTube, Flickr, Facebook etc. Either cloud computing is the future or it isn't.
  • Can't plug in a printer - something makes me think the iPad is about anything but printing. It won't replace the PC or TV. I'll still need that MacBook Pro (required a lightweight 64-bit computer)
Scenarios where the iPad would work for me – everywhere you want to take a netbook/small laptop or wish your phone had a bigger display:
  • On the sofa watching TV and tweeting at the same time (I balanced my laptop to chatter about the BBC program ‘The Virtual Revolution’ last Saturday – the iPad would have been easier)
  • At a conference taking notes on a bum-numbing chair trying to balance the laptop on my legs, the iPad would be easier.
  • On a plane or train reading or preparing a presentation (if I need to demo, the laptop still wins).
  • Social environments for people who want to stay connected when not working. My laptop comes with me on holiday, albeit for light use. Sure I can do email on the phone but it’s not as easy and impossible to properly read through attachments or create anything. I would definitely take the iPad instead and leave the more expensive work kit behind.
  • In meetings of any kind. The laptop is still too invasive in a physical meeting environment. I always ask clients first if they mind me using a laptop to take notes. For certain industries – healthcare, witness interviews for starters – a device like the iPad could be a massive breakthrough. In education, teachers might get to see faces again.

About 7 years ago, Microsoft came out with a Tablet edition of Windows. Given I was working at Microsoft at the time, I was one of the many given a tablet to use and show to people. In many ways, I loved the tablet – it made reading stuff a lot lot easier on the plane and I was travelling around Europe on business at the time. Drawing diagrams for note taking was great but text input was a disaster. You had to use a stylus and the handwriting recognition was terrible (because my handwriting is terrible – I am a true left-hander). Tapping an on-screen keyboard with the stylus was ridiculously slow when I can touch-type on a keyboard. (My mantra to so many organisations – to improve productivity, teach people how to type!). The only kind of data input that really worked on-screen was filling in electronic forms. And if you lost the stylus, you were done for. The tablet screen was not touch-sensitive, it worked through a transmitter in the stylus communicating with the computer. Then there was the weight issue and short battery life, both making it unsuitable for carrying around all day. And finally, the start-up time, even from sleep mode, was too slow. A tablet should switch on in the same time it takes to open a physical notebook. Any longer creates awkward social situations.

It’s early days but the iPad looks like it will do the very things the Microsoft Tablet PC fell short on 7 years ago. That makes it interesting because the tablet as a device has potential in so many areas where netbooks and laptops have failed - where technology needs to get out of the way of interaction.

References:
p.s. that all said, I'm struggling to like the name... but can't suggest a better alternative :-)

29 January 2010

SharePoint 2007 – How to Manage Site Permissions

[Note: This post has been cross-posted from the SharePoint Guide web site]

The presentation below walks through how to manage permissions and control access to a SharePoint site. It assumes you are the owner of your own site, i.e. you have permission to change permissions:

Some additional notes and reminders:

  • Always check with your IT department regarding the policy for managing SharePoint permissions. They may prefer to create directory groups for you that can then be added to SharePoint groups. This approach lets you decide what permissions each group is given without having to manage the user membership. It's also great if you use a distribution list (a type of directory group) to send out email to everyone, as the same group can be used for both activities. IT can't stop you applying your own permissions (short of not letting you be a site owner), but a good identity management system makes life easier for everyone.
  • Do keep permissions as simple as possible. In most projects, I find people treat a lot of information as more sensitive than it really is. SharePoint is at its best when used for collaborative working. You can't collaborate when documents are kept secret. Be sure there is a good reason for locking down access.
  • To quote a good book, Don't Panic! It's easy to reset permissions by simply re-inheriting from the parent site. If you lock yourself out of your own site, after laughing for a while, IT can sort it all out using the SharePoint system account. Not ideal and they won't thank you for the extra workload but all is not lost.

This is the first post in a series I’m creating from a training course I have delivered over the last three years for various clients. Aimed at business users rather than IT, the course is very much hands-on with just a few slides, going from the basics of what is SharePoint through to creating and managing your first site.

This series will be organised under a dedicated web page – The SharePoint 2007 Site Owners Handbook where you can also download a copy of the slides presented here.

27 January 2010

Analyse and Act on Social Media Trends

How to monitor social media conversations, identify trends and act on them came up in a conversation yesterday regarding the role of internal communications managers. As serendipity would have it, just such a solution cropped up via Google Reader, thanks to Mark Miller (@eusp) over on his End User SharePoint site.

Microsoft has a proof of concept built on SharePoint - Looking Glass (must stress: It's a proof of concept (PoC), no mention of an actual working solution yet and Microsoft PoCs often have a dash of smoke and mirrors about them):



But wafting the smoke aside and stepping around the mirrors, the concept is sound. There are plenty of tools on the Internet for visualising trends from social media sites like Twitter and Facebook. (Twistori is a pet favourite of mine for simply observing the world in a conversation) But few go beyond visual analytics. This video explores how to integrate ways that enable you to act on the trends uncovered, what happens next. Interesting stuff. Bet the Microsoft CRM team just love it!... ;-)

23 January 2010

Amateurism can win battles

This Monday’s Start the Week programme on Radio 4 included an interesting discussion about amateurism during World War II, or as it was titled: ‘The dodgy dossier that fooled Hitler’. The short version (I’d encourage you to listen to the podcast, details at the end of the post):

In 1943, allied troops were in North Africa waiting for orders to attack in Europe. If you looked at a map it was pretty obvious where the attack would start – Sicily. To try and gain the upper hand, an elaborate hoax was put in place to try and convince Hitler that instead of Sicily, the attack was going to begin from Greece in the Eastern Mediterranean and Sardinia in the West. This involved procuring a dead person in London, covering up the fact he had died of poisoning to instead make it look like he died in an air crash, dropping him in the sea to float ashore at a specific location in Southern Spain where intercepted messages suggested a particular German secret agent was operating. The false documents planted on the body should hopefully be discovered by said agent, be identified as real battle plans and hopefully be passed up the chain of command to the very top.

The whole idea sounds like some ridiculous plot in a work of fiction. There are far too many variables and dependencies that could go wrong.  And worst of all, if the German secret agent was not fooled by the fake documents, it would beyond doubt confirm Sicily as the real location and likely double Hitler’s efforts there. In short, the plan had as much chance of making matters worse as making them better.

The plan worked.

Listen to the podcast to hear more about it, including “although World War II claimed more lives than any other conflict in history, finding the right dead body was incredibly difficult…” it’s a great conversation. But what’s interesting, and the reason for this post, was a comment made towards the end of the story:

“If Churchill hadn’t been such an enthusiast for this sort of operation and given them full rein…In a way it’s a celebration of amateurism, they were allowed to think what ever they wanted and try it out.”

An Admiral commented about the plan “You can rely on the enemy’s ‘yesmanship’ and ‘wishfulness’”

How many leaders today be prepared to take such a leap of faith? The preference is to rely on statistics and follow standard procedures over ideas and instincts. A simple example was reported this week. Somebody tweeted they were going to blow up their local airport. When discovered by the police, they were arrested under the Terror Act, have had their phone and laptop confiscated, received a lifetime ban from said airport, and been suspended from work until it is decided whether or not they will be prosecuted.  The missing piece of context from this story: just before the alleged bomb threat, the person had been tweeting their frustration with the snow and how it was ruining their holiday plans because the local airport was closed. It was a stupid joke in the current climate. But really, how long should it have taken for someone to decide if this was a serious terrorist threat or not versus following the standard ‘send in the cavalry’ procedure. Our officials are becoming yes-folk. And that puts us at more risk, not less…

The danger in relying on process and statistics at the expense of ideas and instincts is you risk missing the threat in front of your eyes. Perhaps we should bring a bit of amateurism, or humanism, back into official processes.

For the rest of this week (until January 25th) you can download a copy of the programme via iTunes or listen using BBC’s iPlayer

References:

10 January 2010

Our connected future

When you reach the giga, peta, and exa orders of quantities, strange new powers emerge. You can do things at these scales that would have been impossible before...
Kevin Kelly has talked about the coming age of data, oodles of the stuff thanks to the Internet and what we're doing with it. Here's a nice video visualising how all this data and the devices connecting to it will define the future, albeit at the scale of trillions rather than zillions...



...and the makers of the video have more details on their web site - MAYA Design - including a research paper for download (PDF).

Related posts: Tim O'Reilly's talk about The Internet Paradigm and Kevin Kelly's Zillionics Change Perspective

Crashing with the nose up

"Most merit-pay systems share 2 attributes: they absorb vast amounts of management time and make most people unhappy"

The following information was presented by James R.Crow at the KMWorld conference in October 2001. At the time, it highlighted why so many knowledge management systems fail. These days, it's introducing social media to your organisation that faces the same old obstacles.

What do the following systems have in common:?

  • Performance appraisals
  • Reward and recognition
  • Rankings
  • Contests
  • Quotas
  • Management by Objectives (MBOs)
They are all popular programmes used by management in the belief they will improve performance. They also create winners and losers, which is counter-productive to team work and makes it difficult for any knowledge management system to be effective.

The Performance Appraisal

Theory
Reality
  • Reward exceptional performers   
  • Identify poor performers
  • Determine pay rates
  • Feedback on job performance
  • Creates an internally competitive system
  • Takes focus away from the customer
  • Measures most recent performance
  • People similar to the appraiser tend to receive
    higher appraisals

Reward and Recognition

Theory
Reality
  • Good performance should be rewarded   
  • Bad performance should be punished
  • Motivate employees by tying pay to
    performance
  • Selection process can cause conflict within the group
  • Money is not a motivator, it is at best a satisfier
  • Any positive impact on performance is short-lived

Contests, Rankings, Incentives

Theory
Reality
  • We reside in a economy which is based on
    and benefits from competition
  • We will benefit as an organisation by making
    competition the way we do business internally   
  • Creates winners and losers - and there are
    always more losers than winners
  • Ignores (and can damage) the interdepencies
    within and between internal systems

Quotas

Theory
Reality
  • Quotas increase sales because
    people will strive to meet them
  • Without a quota, nobody will sell   
    or produce anything
  • Sales tend to peak at the end of the
    month/quarter/year
  • Sales reps tend to limit sales to slightly above the
    quota and use excess as cushion for next period
The objective should always be for the organisation to win, not component parts.
Management needs to move its thinking from individuals to systems and processes

Will we ever learn?

"Desipte the evident popularity of this practice, the problems with individual merit pay are numerous and well documented. It has been shown to undermine team work, encourage employees to focus on the short term and lead people to link compensation to political skills and ingratiating personalities rather than to performance."
  - Jeffrey Pfeffer, "Six Dangerous Myths About Pay", Harvard Business Review, Spring 1998

References:

Tags: people | productivity | HR

9 Brains Rules for Education

Talk by Marja Brandon at Microsoft, December 2004

An amazing talk by an amazing woman.  If only more schools could/would adopt these methods for teaching. This talk was originally posted direct to the library and has been moved to the blog. The following are notes taken from her talk given at Microsoft in December 2004.

Marja founded a school in Seattle - Seattle Girls School - because she decided the school system was failing girls and making it difficult for them to graduate in science and maths subjects.  Too many distractions led to missing crucial phases of learning - mid School years (5th - 8th grade, equivalent to junior/primary school in the UK).  By the time many get to college, their maths simply isn't strong enough to do science.

Designed a completely original curriculum - no text books!  Based around teaching 4 core skills:
  • Critical and creative thinking
  • Problem posing and solving
  • Bold thinking - don't think outside the box, live outside the box
  • Community connectedness - connect everything they do to the real world

Step 1: Potential

Right from the start, the girls are told that the school's mission is to build the next generation of world leaders.  The kids sit up straight - you light up their ambition and instantly they can start to vision it.  Everyone's scores go through the roof compared to their 'expected' start points.  They don't just sit back and wait for education to flow over their heads, they participate.  They start to hold each other to that potential.  (Not talking about 'gifted' kids, this applies to all <-- for related note, see 'Art of Possibilities' where Benjamin Zander starts the by giving his students an 'A' grade and the year is up to them to decide how they deserve it.)

Step 2: Anti-bias mission

The school encourages as much diversity as possible (race, religion, family unit structure, abilities etc.) - when you get different kids bumping into each other, each one of those bumps is a learning opportunity.

Step 3: Apply what we now know about the brain

We have learnt more about neuro-science in the last 10 years than in the rest of our history.  There is now a giant gap between neuro-science and education.  What are we waiting for?  Traditional class day ends at 3pm - it was designed for the agriculture calendar: run home and do the chores.  Methods were based on schools for boys - right back to the Greek system when it was 4 boys to 1 teacher.  Class sizes are 30 and growing, and they're not just boys any more.

Marja included a big disclaimer at this point: No empirical back up to support what was about to be said.  Don't have lots of lovely research to be shown.  Seen the evidence in play - wanted to try it, apply it and see if it works... and it does!  Marja desperately wants to take this model and apply it at a public school.

The 9 Brain Rules

Marja took 9 brain rules from what we've learnt in neuro-science, and built the curriculum using them.  These rules are based on studies from evolutionary biology - if you don't believe in evolution (i.e. you're an intelligent design purist), you won't believe this stuff...

Rule #1: Meaning before detail

If you are on the plains of the Serengeti and a giant lion is hurtling towards you, you don't stop and count the teeth.  You think it's going to eat you, you run first!  Lesson: figure out the bigger meaning before the detail.  This is applied to each year:

5th grade - 'all creatures great and small' - study what is life. Includes biodiversity, animals, organisms (hint: 5th graders + animals = good thing!)  They have chickens at the school - project 'Chicks in the hood'.

6th grade - 'incredible machine' - study the individual.  They look at themselves, start looking at simple things, tools, machines, how they work... they do the body, then they do the machine, then they do the intersection between machine and body, study biotechnology, nanotechnology, robotics, ethics...

7th grade - 'Seattle from the ground up' - study the community.  Examine the whole area that is Seattle, cover geography, geology, tectonics (Seattle is in earthquake territory), forces that shape the earth, forces that shape the community.  They study governance law, constitutional law.  One of their projects is to do a mock trial at the court house down town.  Finally, they look into the future.  Their final year assignment is 'One month to change the world' and what they propose has to last beyond the assignment.

8th grade - 'The world and beyond' - the sub-theme is to prepare them for graduation to high school.  They start with an aviation theme.  Applying 'meaning before detail' means they start with ground school, weather school and flight school.  Every 8th grader does 2 flights in a 4-seater plane - one as co-pilot (get to do take-off, missed approach, and landing), and one as a cartographer in preparation for their mapping project.  When they get back to school, one of the labs has been built as a hangar and they build a full size kit plane (the kit was donated).  They do everything - the flight systems, physics, all the algebra that's required for avionics, and they end up with a full size plane hanging out in the 8th grade lab.  Amazing!

Back to meaning before detail - they flew first and then they came back into the lab to study, and it all made sense.  What they were studying connected to what they were doing because they had experienced what it means to fly.  Now that's real-world application of what you've learnt.

Rule #2: Every brain is different

There are lots of kids who are told they are 'learning-disabled'.  Marja challenges that diagnosis.  Every brain is different.  Sure there are some 'syndromes' that can be identified, but a dyslexic child gets told they are different to 'everyone else' - these kids get the impression that their brain is broken.  It affects their perception about what they can achieve.

Think of the brain as like a roadmap - we all have the same high ways and major junctions, but those little side roads, they are all different... All the stuff about learning styles - kinaesthetic, visual, linear-sequential etc. - it's not about style, it's simply how your brain routes information, what works for you.

When you have 30 children in a classroom, you have 30 different brains with 30 different routing preferences, and then there's the teacher's brain as well.  As the teacher, you have to be working on a lot of different levels, and teaching in a lot of different modalities to engage all of those brains, and every one of those brains has something to offer.

Classic example:  A girl comes home from maths class and she is really frustrated 'I just don't get it, forget it, I hate it, I'm so dumb, I'm never doing maths again'... and they become a humanities person.  Girls have a habit of eradicating an entire subject based on one bad experience in the class room.  Boy comes home from maths class 'Aargh! I'm so frustrated, I hate this subject'.  Now, interestingly, they don't eliminate the subject from their curriculum, what do they do? 'That teacher is so dumb he can't teach his way out of a paper bag...'  It's not as extreme as the girl's reaction, but neither responses are healthy.

What causes these clashes?  Usually the teacher is using a modality that doesn't work for these children.  A teacher who teaches by writing notes on the board - 'you write this too, and then I'll test you on what we wrote' - won't help someone who's kinaesthetic (easy to spot - will fidget a lot, take things to pieces and put them back together to understand them).

One of the meta-goals for the school is teaching children to identify how they learn, what works for them and what doesn't, and how to speak up when the method the teacher uses doesn't work for them.

Rule #3: People are natural explorers

We did not develop, evolutionary, to sit back and be lectured at.  Back on that Serengeti plain, you explored, tested, tasted, watched, observed.  Seeing a snake with black/yellow stripes bite someone, and watching that person die, causes a mental note - avoid snakes with black/yellow stripes.  You didn't read the book on snakes, you explored, learned and acted.

So, we didn't develop to sit and listen all day, yet that is exactly what we expect children to do today.  And their attention span just can't do it.  We know from brain chemistry that your brain is more alert if you are moving - just getting up and stretching will create a more focused attention state.  Research suggests we need to get the blood going every 9 minutes.  When we sit down, our body assumes sleep cycle 'OK, rest time...'  (note: traditional school uniform in the UK is not conducive to motion or getting dirty).  This school is a project-oriented school.  Children are in groups of 9, 12, 18.  Teachers teach in grade-level teams - sometimes 1 teacher, 2 teachers... the children are constantly in motion, no lecture format (hence no text books).

Children don't want to be told, they want to do, they want to learn for themselves.  Compare the difference: 'I'm going to tell you how things get blown up' versus 'I'm going to show you how things get blown up, and then you're going blow some things up to'.  Compare 'We're going to learn about planes' versus 'We're going to build a plane'.

Rule #4: Sleep is important to the learning process

When you suffer from lack of sleep, it literally slows down your processing time, your attention to detail, and your recall.  This is as true for children as it is for adults.  From biology, what we now know is that children in adolescence (9th through 12th grade) go through a phase when their sleep cycle goes upside down.  They are wide-awake at 10 at night.  They can't help it.  Telling them to just go to bed won't make any difference.  As a result, their sleep cycle hits somewhere between 7 and 9 in the morning... the point when they are supposed to be off to school for the day...  In addition, the mid-point between sleep cycles is the worst time of day.  12 hours from the mid-point of your last sleep phase you will hit a sleep cycle again - and that usually occurs around 2pm in the afternoon.  This is the time to get up, take a walk, rest - it's dead time for you. 
Children have the exact same thing.  But we aren't letting them rest.  They do school, they do after-school activities, they do homework, they go to bed, they get up and it starts all over.  We aren't letting them get enough sleep.

Rule #5: Repetition is critical for memory

You need to hear it again and again and again, but within distinct cycles - just repeating something over and over again is not meaningful repetition, it has to be in critical cycles. The school's curriculum is completely integrated.  You can't build an

airplane without the physics and maths required.  Once they've built the plane, they then get to build to full-size shuttle simulators.  Their culminating event involves groups being locked in a simulator from 4pm until midnight.  Their project has been to design a complete mission to mars, and they then carry out the mission in the simulator. They've got it all figured out, all the tools they need, they know what's going to happen, they've studied everything (clue: that requires the same maths and physics as building the airplane.)  But the teachers than throw in some problems, they've got a 'red-alert' button that can be activated, Star Trek style.  The children have one line to mission control, and when things go wrong they can't leave. They've got to figure out what to do, and still complete their mission to Mars. They've got to apply everything they've learned... oh, and quadratic equations are perfect for aviation.    There comes the same maths again... that's the kind of repetition that works.

Rule #6: We are visual learners

No matter what anyone says, 90% of the information we get is visual. Teachers have to incorporate this.  Standing and lecturing doesn't work, you've got to capture the children.  When you say take out a book and open it, actually pick up the book and open it to demonstrate.  Connect with those routing modalities.

Rule #7: Focused attention states facilitate learning

You cannot maintain the same level of focus for 40 minutes.  Studies suggest that your brain can focus for 7 to 8 minutes on something, but then you need to do something different - get up and do an activity.  It's basic brain stuff.

Rule #8: Exercise aids learning

Already been demonstrated - if you've been reading this for a few minutes, get up and wave your arms about.  Sit down, and you will find it easier to focus on the text...

Rule #9: Stressed brains don't learn well

When your stress level is high, your processing and problem-solving abilities slow down, as does your memory. If you are suffering from chronic stress - serious illness, divorce etc. - those effects will debilitate your immune system.  You'll get sick more often, your sleep cycles will be affected.  This stuff is true for children as well.   Some children are coming from places where they don't know if they will get any sleep, food, dad just lost his job, parents divorcing, whatever... these are chronic stress events for kids.

Quote "There's a million miles from a kid's neuron to the blackboard'.  Children are bringing all that stuff to school and you are telling them to pay attention.  It's a pretty loaded statement - they can't just leave all that stuff at the door.

The 10th Brain Rule: Anti-bias

So they are the 9 brain rules.  There are also differences for boys and girls.  Different areas of the brain develop in different sequences, which is why a lot of times you'll hear that girls are better at language development and boys are better at structure and physical stuff. What typically happens?  Each gender is encouraged to do what they are good at.  What should happen?  Don't just play to those early strengths - give boys more opportunity to work on language and writing, give girls more opportunity to play with structure.

Sociologically we tend to follow what the brain does first and not try to influence it to develop more.  Kids get put into the boxes - girls, go sit at the art table, boys go to the building blocks area.  From a very early age, girls will be complimented for how they look, boys will be complimented for what they do.  This stuff gets fixed very early in life and introduces bias that will continue straight through school, college, work and life.  People don't realise how embedded it is. (Side note: go watch your favourite TV show, watch the adverts - notice the gender stereotypes they are creating, targeting, confirming...)

Marja's 10th brain rule: you have to learn anti-bias work at a very young age.  By high-school, you can still influence some but most are already set.  Middle-school is the most flexible age.  If you can build up self-esteem at that age and give children the words and confidence to not be stereo-typed, it will save them when they get to high school.  And this is just as important for boys as girls - boys who don't fit their traditional stereotype face just the same challenges - they'll get eaten up in the playground and risk never achieving their true individual potential.  This applies to ALL biases <-- related note: try Somebodies and Nobodies by Robert W. Fuller

Internships

Every Wednesday afternoon is dedicated to the internship programme.  Internships are run as 6 week programmes - some taught on campus, off campus in the summer.  The aim is to broaden the girls' horizons. They get to participate in craft skills, mock trials, HTML programming, code breaking, any subject where a successful person or business will participate and show the girls what it's like to pursue a passion and succeed.  An advertising company participated and shut down their office on Wednesdays for 6 weeks - taught the children about the world of advertising, and gave them an account to work on for the project.  They had to do a storyboard and come up with a pitch in 6 weeks.  These are not mini-courses, they are intensive sessions and they breakdown those biased perceptions about what children 'should' do when
they grow up based on their initial 'standing' in life...

The Keys to better education

#1: It's got to be connected learning.  In a typical school if, in September, you ask the 6 year olds what they are learning in Sociology, they will answer 'we're studying the Mayans'.  When you ask why?  'Because it's chapter 1 in the book'  That's why you hear that children lose 80% of what they learn over the Summer.  There is no connection between learning and life.  They are just studying to pass tests but they don't know why they are studying 'this stuff'.

#2: Applied learning:  Learning by doing.  If you watch a video showing you how to change a tyre on the car, will you really know how to do it when the time comes, 5 years later, parked up on a busy road with a flat tyre?

Everything at this school is about connected and applied learning.  The children still have to take written tests, but they also have to do the practical to.  For example, in 6th grade, the children have to answer questions on maths ratios.  Then they have to go into the lab and build a 5:1 wheel ratio.

The national anthem for middle school 'when are we ever going to use this stuff' never happens at this school.  They know when they are going to use what they've learnt - tomorrow, in the lab, building something practical from the real world...  (Marja is currently looking for someone to donate a helicopter...)

...this system has yet to be tested in state education.  Only the independent schools are allowed to do it because they can deviate from what the government dictates should be on the national curriculum (side note: the UK suffers this too).  What does that mean?  The usual trap of 'the rich get richer...' because many of the top independent schools provide this richer learning environment.  Marja founded this school purely through donations.  But we need to see this type of learning on a (inter)national scale, available to everyone.

If I lived in Seattle and had a daughter, I know which school I'd be fighting to get her into.

References:
Delicious tags: education | brain | talks
Note regarding comments: Whilst we do not mind links to external web sites if they are relevant
to the post, comments that include spam, abuse or unsolicited marketing will be removed.